<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Message of Hope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/a-message-of-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/a-message-of-hope/</link>
	<description>Born Again... Secular</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The New Religious Landscape at Lay Theism</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/a-message-of-hope/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Religious Landscape at Lay Theism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=15#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote a while back about the inadequacy of the study by Bruce Hunsberger and Altemeyer of non-believers entitled Atheists.  In fact, the subtitle of their book is at best misleading because of the focus on the atheists in only three samples. Their surveys were very well written, but their samples were terrible. But that was another day (more here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote a while back about the inadequacy of the study by Bruce Hunsberger and Altemeyer of non-believers entitled Atheists.  In fact, the subtitle of their book is at best misleading because of the focus on the atheists in only three samples. Their surveys were very well written, but their samples were terrible. But that was another day (more here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
