Archive for the ‘Statistics’ Category

Links of Reason

Monday, March 31st, 2008

This post is a little more coarse than my usual fare, but several links I have run across recently I feel compelled to group together and share.  Please to enjoy (or click here and enjoy a piping hot mug of STFU):

Really late here - I gotta get some sleep. 

Take care… oh, and question everything!

Sphere: Related Content

Belief-O-Matic(tm)

Saturday, March 29th, 2008

I just completed the Belief-O-Matic(tm) on beliefnet and it is absolutely fascinating.  I answered very carefully and conscienciously based on my current beliefs with the following results.  It looks like I am 100% aligned with Secular Humanists:

The top score on the list below represents the faith that Belief-O-Matic, in its less than infinite wisdom, thinks most closely matches your beliefs. However, even a score of 100% does not mean that your views are all shared by this faith, or vice versa. Belief-O-Matic then lists another 26 faiths in order of how much they have in common with your professed beliefs. The higher a faith appears on this list, the more closely it aligns with your thinking.  
1.  Secular Humanism (100%)
2.  Unitarian Universalism (90%)
3.  Nontheist (81%)
4.  Liberal Quakers (75%)
5.  Neo-Pagan (75%)
6.  Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (64%)
7.  Theravada Buddhism (64%)
8.  Taoism (57%)
9.  Reform Judaism (56%)
10.  New Age (52%)
11.  Mahayana Buddhism (45%)
12.  New Thought (42%)
13.  Scientology (42%)
14.  Bahá’í Faith (37%)
15.  Orthodox Quaker (37%)
16.  Sikhism (37%)
17.  Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (32%)
18.  Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (28%)
19.  Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (24%)
20.  Eastern Orthodox (18%)
21.  Islam (18%)
22.  Jainism (18%)
23.  Orthodox Judaism (18%)
24.  Roman Catholic (18%)
25.  Hinduism (9%)
26.  Seventh Day Adventist (9%)
27.  Jehovah’s Witness (0%)

The most amazing one to me was Quakers.  Who knew that Quakers were so free-thinking?  Actually, I had an idea because I recall that the early Quaker movement in the US was largely due to dissatisfaction with contemporary sects of Christianity and has become even less rigid as of late.

I have considered attending a UU church for the social and intellectual stimulation, but many of the UU blogs and web sites are frequently lamenting that UU denominations are not more “spiritual”.  That’s certainly not for me, so UUism is probably not in my future.

You should check out beliefnet.  It was even more fun to try it again with my ‘Baptist’ upbringing.  Enjoy…

Sphere: Related Content

The New Religious Landscape

Monday, February 25th, 2008

I wrote a while back about the inadequacy of the study by Bruce Hunsberger and Altemeyer of non-believers entitled Atheists.  In fact, the subtitle of their book is at best misleading because of the focus on the atheists in only three samples. Their surveys were very well written, but their samples were terrible. But that was another day (more here).

Today, I want to point out an impressive study with a strong methodology, large sample (35,000), and fascinating conclusions.  The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life has just completed a tremendous survey of religion in the United States and has revealed exactly what I suspected (emphasis mine):

More than one-quarter of American adults (28%) have left the faith in which they were raised in favor of another religion - or no religion at all. If change in affiliation from one type of Protestantism to another is included, 44% of adults have either switched religious affiliation, moved from being unaffiliated with any religion to being affiliated with a particular faith, or dropped any connection to a specific religious tradition altogether.

The survey finds that the number of people who say they are unaffiliated with any particular faith today (16.1%) is more than double the number who say they were not affiliated with any particular religion as children.

My guess is that religion is NOT supplying the answers that people seek.  How can it?  It’s mythology. All religions were completely, 100% dreamt up my men… typically primitive men desperate for explanations regarding tragedy and natural phenomena. 

As more information becomes available via the Internet, our 250+ channels, modern schooling, book stores, etc., people will have more and more difficulty reconciling truth and reality with ancient texts.  Another highlight of the study includes the numbers of “Unaffiliated”. 

Major Religions

Hey, there I am!  I like the description “Secular Unaffiliated”.  How cool is that?  The term Atheist always gives me heartburn because it seems to be used almost like a weapon… for shock and awe. It certainly cuts to the chase. Although, almost anything is better than “bright” - oh, please…

I am not sure what “Religious Unaffiliated” means, but in the future, I would rather see a category called Non-Believer or Non-Theist, and I’m happy to join the atheists there.  I know there is really no distinction between my non-belief and atheism, but note that only 1.6% were comfortable identifying as the latter. 

It’s one of those weird things… when you find that you are an atheist… because it is essentially impossible for you to believe in the claims of religion – you have no choice of succinct label.  Once you are at the point of non-belief, you are, in fact, an a-theist.  HOWEVER, many people (ahem, present company included) still have trouble identifying with that lot.  I have found when it comes right down to picking the words that come out of my mouth when asked (what I am) are “non-believer”. That quickly turns to “You’re an ATHEIST?!” (typically with significantly increased volume on the respondent’s part). To which I must reply, “Yeah, I guess I am.” Then, because I am choosy about the company I keep and allowing the conversation to steer into that area, we usually proceed to have an intelligent conversation.

I know this veered off into “me” territory, but I think this survey is strongly indicative of the unraveling of organized religion, which is exactly what happened to me.  And, unlike over the last several millenia, once the genie is out of the bottle this time, no one will be able to put him back.

As an aside, great post from Majikthise.

Sphere: Related Content

Now that’s comedy…

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Nice work, xkcd:

The Data So Far

(Translation for the blind)

Claims of supernatural powers:
Confirmed by experiment — 0
Refuted by experiment — all the rest

James Randi would be proud.

Keep up the good work.

Sphere: Related Content

A Message of Hope

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

As interesting as the book Atheists: A Groundbreaking Study of America’s Nonbelievers is, I think I take issue with its groundbreakingness. 

It suffers from what appears to be very common when studying atheists – the study considers only absolute non-believers (°Faith=zero).  This seems to compromise their study in a number of ways relating to sample size and reasonable cross-section of the population (bias).  I give them credit for trying, but I wonder if it’s possible to do even better… via the Internet.   Their study was entire on paper, mailed to atheist organizations.  Now that fact alone seems to seriously narrow the sample.  My lack of belief is at a place where I would be perfectly happy and enjoy myself in a room full of atheists, but the likelihood of me joining a club that meets face-to-face to chat about is pretty much nil.  (By the way, why do the ffrf and other organizations have to come off so weird? Where are the mainstream non-believers?)

So, the question that floats through my head is, How many people kinda like me are out there?  I wouldn’t presume to be a silent majority, but I think the numbers are probably much higher than estimated even in the US. 

Life without Faith points out a more encouraging result from the UK Times Online.  Has anyone seen a really strong survey or methodology for finding out the true faith makeup of the US population?  Every study I have seen is seriously flawed in some way.

Sphere: Related Content