<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lay Theism &#187; election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog/tag/election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog</link>
	<description>Born Again... Secular</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Atheist McCain&#8230; not surprising</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/atheist-mccain-not-surprising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/atheist-mccain-not-surprising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In David Waters latest Under God column he posits that McCain is with some likelihood not a believer in God.  I would only add to that&#8230; Duh.  Look at his life.  Why would he believe in God? I won&#8217;t drag you through the entire history. I&#8217;m just saying, it seems unlikely given what he has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In David Waters latest <a title="McCain the Athiest slash Agnostic POW" href="http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2008/10/examining_mccains_god_and_coun.html">Under God</a> column he posits that McCain is with some likelihood not a believer in God.  I would only add to that&#8230; Duh.  Look at his life.  Why would he believe in God? I won&#8217;t drag you through the <a title="McCain's Life and Stuff" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/john_mccain/index.html">entire history</a>. I&#8217;m just saying, it seems unlikely given what he has been through.  <a title="Hell is for Children" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz7A0MAvofE">Hell</a>, I&#8217;ve been through a whole lot less and I don&#8217;t <a title="WHERE IS GOD IN TIMES OF SUFFERING?" href="http://radicalopinions.blogspot.com/2007/12/where-is-god-in-times-of-suffering.html">believe in God</a>. I have never been witness to a <a title="There are no miracles - especially in mines" href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/01/04/undoing-a-miracle/">miracle</a> or even had a credible account of <a title="Actual miracle caught on film!!" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUiCXuyp_Qk">someone experiencing one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/atheist-mccain-not-surprising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/president-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holy shit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vpilf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a trip&#8230;  Tonight I am resigned to declaring that Obama will win the election by popular vote.  I have been doing a lot of reading and thinking on the topic, and I think that McCain is up against too tough an economic disaster to win in the incumbent party.  Also, with Sarah Palin acting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a trip&#8230;  Tonight I am resigned to declaring that <a title="FF00FF (FFOOFF) - FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions list) for the 2008 United States Presidential Election by Peter Norvig" href="http://norvig.com/election-faq.html">Obama will win</a> the election by popular vote.  I have been doing a lot of reading and thinking on the topic, and I think that McCain is up against too tough an economic disaster to win in the incumbent party.  Also, with Sarah Palin acting so folksy and <a title="Palin showed a surprising degree of fluentness in her points" href="http://culturedecoded.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/analysis-the-vice-presidential-debate/">clever</a> while never really getting deep or taking chances, I think her value to the ticket continues to diminish. <a title="Sarah Palin kicked ass... and was pretty damn hot" href="http://www.johnmccain.com/content/default.aspx?guid=823a0fa5-68d3-4071-98e9-dd72b9596768">She was great</a> tonight, but maybe not great enough to push through the morass to victory a month from now.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; that&#8217;s all I really have for now.  Just wanted to revisit in writing <a title="I may have been wrong about President McCain" href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/liberalism-sounds-like-atheism/">my thoughts from February</a> prior to the complete economic meltdown we are in now.  As I have said before, I am <a title="Gun Toting Liberal?  Nice." href="http://guntotingliberal.com/?p=3431">very moderate</a> in my views so I have no particular issue with either party winning the election as long as they do the least amount of damage (the dreaded, obsolete two party system is a topic for another day).</p>
<p>So, my thoughts have turned to <a title="Welcome to Socialist America" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/04/AR2008030402331.html">Obama&#8217;s first 100 days</a> in the White House.  What will he do&#8230; and will we like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/sarah-palin-and-hillary-clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/sarah-palin-and-hillary-clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing the best SNL opening I have seen in a while, I was inspired to blog about it.  First, Tina Fey nails Sarah Palin&#8230; in the theatrical sense.  Then, they whipped out (oops) the whole MILF thing. But they couldn&#8217;t leave it at that.  Amy Poehler doing Hillary (stop that) says that she doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing the <a title="Palin / Hillary Saturday Night Live Non-Partisan Message" href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/34465/saturday-night-live-palin--hillary-open">best SNL opening</a> I have seen in a while, I was inspired to blog about it.  First, Tina Fey nails Sarah Palin&#8230; in the theatrical sense.  Then, they whipped out (oops) the whole MILF thing. But they couldn&#8217;t leave it at that.  Amy Poehler doing Hillary (stop that) says that she doesn&#8217;t like being referred to as a &#8220;flirj&#8221;. Yeah, I had no clue, so I &#8220;Gergled&#8221; it like Hillary did.  Who would have known that there&#8217;s something Google doesn&#8217;t know?!  At any rate, the best I came up with was <a title="Definition of FLIRJ" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=flirj">FLIRJ</a> = First Lady&#8230; I&#8217;d Rather Jack-Off.  Supposedly IRJ is a common suffix, so it follows that we would end up with flirj (vs. <a title="Definition of FLIRG" href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=flirj">flirg</a>, flerg, flerge, flerj, flerje, flirg, flirge, flirj, flirje, flurg, flurge, flurje, flurj, or flurdge which are clearly ridiculous and just plain wrong).</p>
<p>Actually, what made me laugh was later in the show when Alaska Pete (which harkins back to Produce Pete &#8212; not this <a title="Produce Pete on Beets from Hoboken" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yCixSpKJfA">douche</a>, this <a title="Steve Carell as Produce Pete" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=112770&amp;title=Produce-Pete-Steve-Carell---Beets">douche</a>) pointed out that Sarah Palin is not just a MILF, but is soon to officially be a GILF.  Kinda funny, and had not occurred to me&#8230; although I had already heard VPILF elsewhere.</p>
<p>Anyway, as you may or may not know based on the general ideology of this blog, I do not share Gov. Palin&#8217;s view of the world having been created in six days because God thought it was a good idea.  Nor, do I think that her youngest son was born with Down&#8217;s Syndrome because God thought that would be swell too.  In fact, I think it&#8217;s sad that McCain felt he needed to add that particular contrast to his ticket. On the other hand, she has shaken up this campaign in a way that was badly needed.</p>
<p>I still think <a title="McCain/Palin will win in 2008" href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/liberalism-sounds-like-atheism/">McCain is to be the next president</a>, and it scares me less than <a title="Obama is way too much like Cuba's Fidel Castro" href="http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/main.asp?SectionID=17&amp;subsectionID=116&amp;articleID=50042">Obama</a>.  I will reluctantly cast my vote for the screwed up, broken, Republican party once again.  If the Democrats can ever get their shit together and start to act like they will be responsible with our money, they&#8217;ll have my vote in a heartbeat (I am not implying that I think the Republicans have been responsible with our money, but they don&#8217;t overtly want to take as much of it away).  Until then, I feel like I have no choice but to deal with crazy Christians and the rest of the right outside of the political forum.  At the end of the day, I guess I worry more about my checkbook than I do my kid&#8217;s textbook.</p>
<h5>[HEY!  Thanks for visiting... I recently learned that this is the most  popular entry on my blog -- please check out some of my other content  while you are wasting your life.]  [<a title="Laythiesm Blog Home" href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog">Home</a>]</h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/sarah-palin-and-hillary-clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Way Over the Top</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/way-over-the-top/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/way-over-the-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter where you land politically, having Hillary Clinton as the Commander in Chief of the United States has got to cause you to think about the ramifications of such a possibility. 
A few days ago, Peggy Noonan summed up why she thought Hillary has been able to muster a comeback of sorts, but also paints a vivid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter where you land politically, having Hillary Clinton as the Commander in Chief of the United States has got to cause you to think about the ramifications of such a possibility. </p>
<p>A few days ago, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120485348696518343.html?mod=Declarations" title="Hillary Clinton is insane">Peggy Noonan</a> summed up why she thought Hillary has been able to muster a comeback of sorts, but also paints a vivid picture of what it would mean for her to succeed: </p>
<blockquote><p>She kept her own spirits up to the point of denial and worked it, hard, every day. She is hardy, resilient, tough. She is a train on a track, an Iron Horse. But we must not become carried away with generosity. The very qualities that impress us are the qualities that will make her a painful president. She does not care what you think, she will have what she wants, she will not do the feints, pivots and backoffs that presidents must. She is neither nimble nor agile, and she knows best. She will wear a great nation down.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very well said, Peggy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/way-over-the-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberalism Sounds Like Atheism</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/liberalism-sounds-like-atheism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/liberalism-sounds-like-atheism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that I am not consuming a constant stream of right-leaning rhetoric via radio, TV, church, or otherwise, I don&#8217;t have the same knee-jerk reaction to &#8220;liberal&#8221; thinking as I used to.  I now seek a very wide variety of news and information sources (including the occasional conservative rant).  After reading for a while the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I am not consuming a constant stream of right-leaning rhetoric via radio, TV, church, or otherwise, I don&#8217;t have the same knee-jerk reaction to &#8220;liberal&#8221; thinking as I used to.  I now seek a very wide variety of news and information sources (including the occasional conservative rant).  After reading for a while the other night, I ran across this passage by <a href="http://www.robertreich.org/reich/20040601.asp" title="Robert Reich">Robert B. Reich</a> on his web site:</p>
<blockquote><p>Liberalism is the opposite of fanaticism. We cherish tolerance. We value deliberation. We respect rational argument. We oppose all forms of tyranny. We have faith &#8212; and it is nothing but faith &#8212; that, in the end, they won&#8217;t be able to drown us out, because common sense and common decency are on our side.</p></blockquote>
<p>What I find interesting about this quote is that it should apply to all people&#8230; this is not an extremist viewpoint owned by the left.  It&#8217;s a humanist point-of-view.  It&#8217;s the way it should be.</p>
<p>The older I get, and the more I study the human condition, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120053277483496183.html" title="Liberal Hatemongers By ARTHUR C. BROOKS">more tolerant</a> I am&#8230; the more thoughtful. However, he is not quite right &#8211; replace <em>Liberalism</em> above with <em>Humanism</em> (or even <em>Atheism</em>) and then we are getting somewhere.  I think there are opportunists and idiots on both extremes of the left and right. I find that the folks in <a href="http://middleclassguy.com/2008/02/uncertainty.html" title="People are turning to more moderate positions and the old left and right wings are mired in the legacies of the past.">The Great Middle</a> are the ones that respect human rights and liberty regardless of personal beliefs, ethnic background, or lifestyle.  The people that I know that strongly identify with either conservatives or liberals tend to be judgmental, closed-minded, dogmatic goofballs.</p>
<p>And, switching gears, I&#8217;ll go out on a limb and say that &#8220;The Great Middle&#8221; is the slice of our US population that is going to elect Senator John McCain as <a href="http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=6116" title="McCain in 2008">the next President</a> of the United States.  Why a Mormon and an Evangelical Christian thought they were electable illustrates what a bubble they live in.  And on the left, Barack Obama is just too far to the left&#8230; and we won&#8217;t even talk about Hillary Clinton.  That leaves the most &#8220;moderate&#8221; candidate standing at the end of the day.</p>
<p>Congratulations extremists on both sides!  You&#8217;ve chosen our next Commander in Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/liberalism-sounds-like-atheism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
