<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lay Theism &#187; poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laytheism.com/blog/tag/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog</link>
	<description>Born Again... Secular</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Feeling Thermometers</title>
		<link>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/feeling-thermometers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/feeling-thermometers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laytheism.com/blog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#8217;t you know it, a few days after I ponder my Beliefometer, the Wall Street Journal publishes a commentary by Arthur C. Brooks that points out a common polling instrument called a Feeling Thermometer.
As we are dragged through another election season, it is worth critically reviewing these stereotypes. Do the data support the claim that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you know it, a few days after I ponder my Beliefometer, the Wall Street Journal publishes a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120053277483496183.html" title="Liberal Hatemongering?">commentary by Arthur C. Brooks</a> that points out a common polling instrument called a Feeling Thermometer.</p>
<blockquote><p>As we are dragged through another election season, it is worth critically reviewing these stereotypes. Do the data support the claim that conservatives are haters, while liberals are tolerant of others? A handy way to answer this question is with what political analysts call &#8220;feeling thermometers,&#8221; in which people are asked on a survey to rate others on a scale of 0-100. A zero is complete hatred, while 100 means adoration. In general, when presented with people or groups about which they have neutral feelings, respondents give temperatures of about 70. Forty is a cold temperature, and 20 is absolutely freezing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty interesting, but I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s entirely true. If the mean response for neutral feelings is 70, what does that mean for these public figures?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/12140">Giuliani is Highest Ranked U.S. Politician</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I know it&#8217;s not quite the same thing, but the way they totally ripped off my scaling is uncanny. Furthermore, what if I am neither liberal nor conservative&#8230; what then polling people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laytheism.com/blog/2008/feeling-thermometers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

